A RetroSearch Logo

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Search Query:

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2004-August/046777.html below:

[Python-Dev] Tuple/list assignment question

[Python-Dev] Tuple/list assignment question"Martin v. Löwis" martin at v.loewis.de
Wed Aug 4 06:51:28 CEST 2004
Greg Ewing wrote:
> Having to explicitly slice off the part you want to unpack not only
> seems inefficient (constructing an intermediate list or tuple just to
> immediately unpack it and throw it away) it also tends to obfuscate
> what is going on.

Of course, the proposed syntax does not change this. Compare

a,b,c = foo()[:3]

to

a,b,c,*_ = foo()

In either case, the extra fields obfuscate things, and in either
case, a second tuple is created. In the latter case, the tuple
is even stored in a variable.

Regards,
Martin
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4