Greg Ewing wrote: > Having to explicitly slice off the part you want to unpack not only > seems inefficient (constructing an intermediate list or tuple just to > immediately unpack it and throw it away) it also tends to obfuscate > what is going on. Of course, the proposed syntax does not change this. Compare a,b,c = foo()[:3] to a,b,c,*_ = foo() In either case, the extra fields obfuscate things, and in either case, a second tuple is created. In the latter case, the tuple is even stored in a variable. Regards, Martin
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4