> Now, it's true that this will just become '@when("whatever")' in
> 2.4, and I'm *fine* with that, just disappointed that the syntax
> won't be forward compatible.
Implementability in 2.2 and 2.3 was never on the list of requirements
for decorators. You're adding this constraint yourself. I know it
was brought up before but I never agreed with that constraint (and the
previous community favorite, [...]-after-args, wasn't compatible
either).
I presume your framework is already full of hacks, which is fine by
me, but I don't want to use it as a deciding factor for the decorator
syntax.
--Guido van Rossum (home page: http://www.python.org/~guido/)
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4