RetroSearch Browse

Tue Aug 3 16:25:55 CEST 2004 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2004-August/046706.html

Guido van Rossum wrote:
> The intention was to introduce sharing of the filename object between
> code objects compiled from the same file (remember that every method
> is a separate code object).
> 
> But I believe the sharing won't happen when the code is loaded from a
> bytecoded file instead, so it is indeed wasted efficiency.

In 2.4, it would: strings that are interned when being marshalled will
get interned on unmarshalling.

Regards,
Martin

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2004-August/046706.html below:

[Python-checkins] python/dist/src/Python compile.c, 2.311, 2.312