RetroSearch Browse

Tue Aug 3 14:51:36 CEST 2004 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2004-August/046698.html

On Tue, 03 Aug 2004 11:48:24 +0200, Sjoerd Mullender <sjoerd at acm.org> wrote:
> This is indeed perverted.  Another option is to add a statement
>         (void) status;
> somewhere to the function and to remove the status++ from the return.
> This seems to shut up all compilers I've dealt with.

I believe we use this idiom elsewhere in the Python codebase.  If it's
combined with a comment like /* avoid compile warning about unused
variable */ it's quite clear.

Jeremy

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2004-August/046698.html below:

[Python-checkins] python/dist/src/Objects listobject.c, 2.218, 2.219