Jim Fulton <jim at zope.com> writes: > Phillip J. Eby wrote: >> At 12:32 PM 8/2/04 -0400, Jim Fulton wrote: >> >>> I propose to add the following function to the imp module: > > ... > >> Is this intended to work in the presence of import hooks? In >> particular, all the hooks offered by PEP 302, but also systems like >> 'iu', 'imputil', etc. >> Or, more specifically, will this be implemented in terms of the PEP >> 302 importer/loader protocols, or will those protocols need >> extending in order to allow such loaders (e.g. zipimport) to work >> with this new function? > > Paul Moore wrote: > ... > > Does this work in the presence of PEP 302 style import hooks? > > Specifically, the case where there's a zipfile on sys.path. > > Good question. I was planning to implement this in terms of > imp.find_module, but that won't work in light of PEP 302. Dang. > It's too bad that the imp.get_loader proposed in PEP 302 isn't > implemented. > > Paul, do you have an implementation of what would have been > imp.get_loader? Sorry, no. Just did the implementation, I mainly did some of the write-up, testing, and cheerleading. Paul. -- Ooh, how Gothic. Barring the milk.
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4