On Mon, 2004-08-02 at 10:40, Phillip J. Eby wrote: > At 04:32 PM 8/2/04 +1000, Anthony Baxter wrote: > >The @decorator patch has been landed on the trunk, after > >getting the go-ahead from the BDFL. I'll update PEP-0318 > >with the final syntax in the next day or so. > > @decorator won? When did that happen? First I heard about it was when I saw Anthony's checkin messages. Maybe it was throwing that pie that inspired Guido -- an '@' does kind of look like a pie. I think Anthony's checkin message was accurate enough though -- it's the syntax everyone can hate equally. But I'm glad /something/ made it in! print>>-set-the-precedent-ly y'rs, -Barry -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 307 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part Url : http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20040802/1dad5c36/attachment.pgp
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4