Anthony Baxter wrote: > The @decorator patch has been landed on the trunk, after > getting the go-ahead from the BDFL. I'll update PEP-0318 > with the final syntax in the next day or so. > > We're aiming for 2.4a2 this Thursday - so can people please > hold off on checking into the trunk from Wednesday evening > onwards, please. > > At the moment, I'm guessing we're going to have a 2.4a3 in > a couple of weeks. I'm getting the following assertion from a debug build: Python 2.4a1+ (#1, Aug 2 2004, 11:21:35) [GCC 2.96 20000731 (Red Hat Linux 7.3 2.96-113)] on linux2 Type "help", "copyright", "credits" or "license" for more information. >>> @staticmethod ... def x(): ... pass ... python: Python/ceval.c:868: PyEval_EvalFrame: Assertion `(stack_pointer - f->f_valuestack) <= f->f_stacksize' failed. Aborted Bye, Walter Dörwald
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4