A RetroSearch Logo

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Search Query:

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2004-August/046601.html below:

[Python-Dev] Safe to change a thread's interpreter?

[Python-Dev] Safe to change a thread's interpreter? [Python-Dev] Safe to change a thread's interpreter?"Martin v. Löwis" martin at v.loewis.de
Mon Aug 2 09:34:20 CEST 2004
Phillip J. Eby wrote:
> Yes, I saw that as a documented limitation.  Are there undocumented 
> limitations as well?  

Might be. However, there is one more documented the limitation: The PEP
311 extensions only work for a single interpreter state, as the PEP
explains.

> Is the feature headed for deprecation?  I guess 
> I'm not understanding your implication(s), if any.

That is not surprising, as the implication is not at all obvious :-)
Here it is: Because the feature is essentially ill-designed, I'm not
going to comment on the actual question (or on any other actual
question about that feature), except for pointing out that the feature
is fundamentally flawed. This is just my own policy, though.

Regards,
Martin
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4