Guido van Rossum wrote: >>Circular imports, to be made consistent, would need >>something like a final "commit" after all imports succeeded. > > > Silly idea. Typically, circular imports aren't planned, they just > happen, and (usually) just happen to work. Yes, you name it, if you are talking about allowing circular imports without precautions and not expecting problems. Like circular references which aren't planned, they just happen, but they truely work fine after GC was introduced. -- Christian Tismer :^) <mailto:tismer at stackless.com> Mission Impossible 5oftware : Have a break! Take a ride on Python's Johannes-Niemeyer-Weg 9a : *Starship* http://starship.python.net/ 14109 Berlin : PGP key -> http://wwwkeys.pgp.net/ work +49 30 89 09 53 34 home +49 30 802 86 56 mobile +49 173 24 18 776 PGP 0x57F3BF04 9064 F4E1 D754 C2FF 1619 305B C09C 5A3B 57F3 BF04 want to see a silly guy's work? http://www.stackless.com/
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4