On Fri, 16 Apr 2004 00:17:24 -0400
"Tim Peters" <tim_one at email.msn.com> wrote:
> [Facundo Batista, on whether to limit exponent magnitude]
[..]
> No, I want to spell the spec's mandatory from-string *operation*
> (which does use and affect context, in the specified ways) via an
> optional bool argument to the Decimal constructor. This isn't at all
> useless, although if you're only thinking about a money type it may
> seem that way. In general number-crunching, literals may be given to
> high precision, but that precision isn't free and *usually* isn't
> needed: the operations in the spec don't round back inputs to current
> context precision before computing, they only round outputs after, and
> digits feeding into computation are expensive. So, in general, a
> scientific user will usually *not* want all the digits in
>
> pi = Decimal("3.1415926535897932384626433832795",
> use_context=True)
>
> to be used. Instead they'll want to set the working precision once in
> context, and have their literals automatically get rounded back to
> that precision.
[..]
I find boolean arguments a general anti-pattern, especially given we
have class methods. Why not use an alternate constructor like::
pi = Decimal.rounded_to_context("3.1415926535897932384626433832795")
Spelling notwithstanding.
-Casey
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4