[Ka-Ping Yee]
#- Could we please have repr(d) use the string in the constructor
#- rather than the tuple form? That would be much easier to read.
#-
#- So, for example:
#-
#- >>> Decimal('12345')
#- Decimal('12345') # instead of Decimal((0, (1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 0))
#- >>> _ * 10
#- Decimal('1.2345e1')
#- >>> Decimal('12345', 2)
#- Decimal('1.2e3')
#- >>> Decimal(1.1)
#- Decimal('1.100000000000000088817841970012523233890533447265625')
#- >>> Decimal(1.1, default_context=1)
#- Decimal('1.10000000')
To *me* is more natural the tuples. But that's only because that's what the
internal objects are.
An intermediate solution can be something like:
>>> Decimal('12345')
Decimal(0, 12345, 0)
a tuple of three values: sign, coefficient, and exponent. The three of them
as integers.}
Anyway, if you want to change the repr() behaviour, you should push it hard
to the list. I'm -0 on it.
. Facundo
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4