RetroSearch Browse

Tue Apr 13 13:48:34 EDT 2004 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2004-April/044212.html

> I have the impression that it is proposed that the function f will
*not*
> yet be bound to its name (f.func_name) in its environment at the time
the
> decorator is called.

Hmm, that would be a change.  Currently, staticmethod() and
classmethod() take fully formed functions as inputs.  So, if your
impression is correct, there would be a small semantic difference
between the [classmethod] prefix and f=classmethod(f) postfix
decoration.

Raymond Hettinger

#################################################################
#################################################################
#################################################################
#####
#####
#####
#################################################################
#################################################################
#################################################################

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2004-April/044212.html below:

[Python-Dev] Re: Candidate Function Decorator