On Fri, 2004-04-09 at 05:44, Mark Russell wrote: > It's a trivial change to disallow the second form - I'm pretty much > 50/50 on whether it's a good idea to allow it or not. Probably "There's > only one way to do it" should apply. (The change is trivial - in > Grammar/Grammar, just replace [NEWLINE] with NEWLINE in the decorators > entry). Personally, I think it's fine to allow them to be on the same line. I wouldn't want to arbitrarily disallow it because we're worried about how the tools will react. If people gravitate toward this syntax because it's more readable, then the tools will eventually adjust. just-because-you-can-doesn't-mean-you-should-ly y'rs, -Barry
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4