On 2004-04-06, at 01.24, David Eppstein wrote: > > Ok, then how about > <decorator> > def ... > ? > > '<' can't start an expression or statement currently, can it? Yeah. I think that would look better. On the other hand ... On 2004-03-31, at 17.42, Guido van Rossum wrote: > Why does <...> look better than [...]? To me, <...> just reminds me > of XML, which is totally the wrong association. > > There are several parsing problems with <...>: the lexer doesn't see < > and > as matched brackets, so you won't be able to break lines without > using a backslash, and the closing > is ambiguous -- it might be a > comparison operator.
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4