> What about: > > [as classmethod] > def foo(bar, baz): > pass > > To me this is more obvious (and less like p*rl) that *[classmethod], and > it is also currently a syntax error so won't break existing code. I appreciate the suggestion, but the current parser can't handle that. --Guido van Rossum (home page: http://www.python.org/~guido/)
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4