At 03:24 PM 4/3/04 -0600, Skip Montanaro wrote: >That is, there is already an (otherwise invalid) 'x' in the calling scope >when propget() is called. Do the property doodads just need to be >bulletproofed or should an exception be raised? If I recall correctly, the implementation someone contributed earlier this week (sorry I don't remember his name) raised an exception if the previous binding of the function name was not an instance of 'property'.
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4