> > One more (possibly unclear) case to consider: > > import . as package > > Is this a way to name your parent package? > > Nope. All uses of relative imports require ``from <something> import`` Right. > (I think the PEP makes that clear). You could, however, do > > from ... import package [as foo] > > if Guido permits it; I want a Pronouncement on that before adding it > to the PEP. Yes, even if ... refers to the root package (but not if it tries to reach beyond that). But this doesn't handle his case: what he wanted (if it were allowed) would rename the current package to 'package' no matter what its real name. Not that I care about that use case. :-) --Guido van Rossum (home page: http://www.python.org/~guido/)
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4