A RetroSearch Logo

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Search Query:

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2004-April/043978.html below:

[Python-Dev] Re: PEP 328 -- relative and multi-line import

[Python-Dev] Re: PEP 328 -- relative and multi-line import [Python-Dev] Re: PEP 328 -- relative and multi-line importDavid Goodger goodger at python.org
Sat Apr 3 07:52:03 EST 2004
Guido van Rossum wrote:
 > At least "from . import X" and "from .. import X" are completely
 > clear and more levels up are not likely to occur in practice...

I have Aahz's revision ready to check in, but I'm unclear on one
point.  Is the accepted/pronounced relative import syntax dots only,
or can there be a branch too?  In other words, is the "Y" here
acceptable (where Y is a sibling to the current module's package)?

     from ..Y import X

I think the PEP needs a clear statement (and examples) of which syntax
**and semantics** have been chosen.

-- David Goodger

More information about the Python-Dev mailing list

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4