On Thu, 2004-04-01 at 10:44, Guido van Rossum wrote: > > Anyhow, I just meant that if you find a pair of characters that are > > illegal today then many of the objections about abusing existing syntax > > would go away. > > So how about *[...]* ? Or perhaps [*...*]? Or [|...|]? I'm -0 on whether it's necessary, but of these choices the latter seems okay. -Barry
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4