Guido van Rossum wrote: >>>Why does <...> look better than [...]? To me, <...> just reminds me >>>of XML, which is totally the wrong association. >> >>I vote for << >>. The brackets and parens have too many meanings in >>Python already. <<staticmethod, foobar(baz)>> looks more like French >>than XML. ;) > > > <<...>> has the same practical problems as <...>: no automatic line > breaking, >> is ambiguous. Sorry. I forgot that ">>" is also an operator. ;) Anyhow, I just meant that if you find a pair of characters that are illegal today then many of the objections about abusing existing syntax would go away. Paul Prescod
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4