RetroSearch Browse

Thu Sep 25 23:23:20 EDT 2003 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2003-September/038311.html

Fred L. Drake, Jr. wrote:
> Martin v. Löwis writes:
>  > A PEP would not be appropriate: it would indicate the need for BDFL
>  > pronouncement on the procedures presented, or consensus within some
>  > group, when I think neither consensus nor BDFL pronouncement is
>  > necessary. Instead, a plain web page on python.org would be
>  > sufficient.
> 
> If some4one writes up a reST document describing this, it would be
> easy enough to add it to the dev/ area.
> 

Just so people don't go too far with this, I am going to be typing up 
something about the Python development process.  It is going to be my 
entry for a talk at PyCon this year.

So something that encompasses all of this will get written up by 
December.  If it isn't a total piece of literary trash I will add it to 
/dev on the site.

-Brett

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2003-September/038311.html below:

[Python-Dev] PEP on patch processing