RetroSearch Browse

Thu Sep 25 19:46:31 EDT 2003 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2003-September/038308.html

On Fri, Sep 26, 2003, Martin v. Löwis wrote:
> Michael Bartl <zeddicus at satokar.com> writes:
>> 
>> I just wanted to ask if there is interest in a PEP about that topic,
>> because I couldn't find any relevant information on python.org.
> 
> A PEP would not be appropriate: it would indicate the need for BDFL
> pronouncement on the procedures presented, or consensus within some
> group, when I think neither consensus nor BDFL pronouncement is
> necessary. Instead, a plain web page on python.org would be
> sufficient.

Hmmmm....  While I'd agree with you in the absence of anything else, it
seems to me that the existence of PEP 3 indicates that this subject is
PEP-worthy.  Unless you want to argue that PEP 3 should be removed?...
-- 
Aahz (aahz at pythoncraft.com)           <*>         http://www.pythoncraft.com/

"It is easier to optimize correct code than to correct optimized code."
--Bill Harlan

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2003-September/038308.html below:

[Python-Dev] PEP on patch processing