>>> Thomas Heller wrote > Michael Hudson <mwh at python.net> writes: > > > I think in future we should probably do the "2.3.2c1", wait a week, do > > "2.3.2" thing. It's more work, but there have been enough nits that I > > think it would have been worthwhile (readline vs. no threads, fsync > > and the docs issue spring to mind). > > +1 +1 from me, also. I'll make sure to put words to the effect in the PEPs. -- Anthony Baxter <anthony at interlink.com.au> It's never too late to have a happy childhood.
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4