> Jeremy> It looks like current CVS has grown a pending deprecation > Jeremy> warning for the update() method of Sets ... [Skip] > +1 on everything Jeremy wrote. One other thought: having a PendingDeprecationWarning is somewhat innocuous. By default, those warnings are filtered out (set to Ignore). You have to ask to see them. It would be much different for a DeprecationWarning. It is pretty conservative to issue a pending warning now, a deprecation warning in 2.4, and remove the duplicate method in 2.5. This is doubly true for a brand new module that has only a minimal existing code base. Not bringing it up for 12 to18 months is, IMHO, much more impactful. Raymond
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4