Barry> On Mon, 2003-09-15 at 11:03, Neal Norwitz wrote:
>> I think 2.3 has been great! There were a few memory leaks plugged.
>> I don't even recall any crashes specific to 2.3. I'm very happy with
>> the apparent robustness of 2.3. Maybe nobody is using it? :-)
Barry> I'm using it for everything, and I agree!
Ditto on my development machine, except I just cvs up periodically, so I'm
generally running from CVS as of a few days ago, not even 2.3. I do intend
to update to 2.3 on the Mojam webserver in a short while. That should
provide a nice speed boost over the 2.2.3 I'm currently running there.
>> As far as the release schedule for 2.4, I haven't heard any squawking
>> recently about Python changing too fast.
Barry> We can't let that stand, now can we? :)
I suspect that's simply because the focus was on library and performance
improvements instead of new language features.
Barry> There's still time to get PEPpy too.
I would like to get back to PEP 304 (Control of pyc file location). I got
stuck when someone raised some good objections about how it would play on
Windows with it's multiple rooted file system, but if those problems can be
ironed out I think it would be a good addition to the system.
Skip
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4