On Mon, 2003-09-15 at 08:51, A.M. Kuchling wrote: > I'd be in favor of setting an arbitrary date for a 2.4 release, and when > that date rolls around stabilizing and releasing the CVS tree, no matter > what's been implemented or not implemented. If we've made major language > revisions by that time, fine, but it's worthwhile even if 2.4 is just 2.3 + > (various bugfixes deemed too risky for 2.3.1) + (a few new modules). > > PEP 320 estimates February 2005, a 19-month gap matching that between 2.2 > and 2.3. That seems a bit too long, especially if there are no large > changes that require testing; aiming for autumn 2004, beginning to freeze > in August, seems reasonable. +1 -Barry
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4