Michael Hudson > "Mark Hammond" <mhammond at skippinet.com.au> writes: > > > That would work, be less intrusive, and allow all existing > code to work > > unchanged. My only concern is that it does not go anywhere > towards fixing > > the buffer interface itself. > > I think that is a different issue entirely. While it may be > interesting and important, can we at least try to keep them separate? I don't see how. The only problem I see is in the buffer interface. We could worm around the buffer interface problem in the buffer object, but I don't see how that is keeping them separate. Am I missing something? Mark.
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4