Michael Hudson wrote: > "Brett C." <bac at OCF.Berkeley.EDU> writes: > > >>Dennis Allison wrote: >> >> >>>Brett -- >>>You might put together a list of all the ideas (maybe even a ranked >>>list) >>>and post it as a unit to the list for archival purposes. Thanks. >>> >> >>Way ahead of you, Dennis. I have already started to come up with a >>reST doc for writing up all of these suggestions. It just might be a >>little while before I get it up since I will need to do some >>preliminary research on each idea to measure the amount of work they >>will be. > > > Could go on the Python Wiki? > Could. Let me get it done in reST locally, then I can look at adding it to the wiki. > I take it from your posting of last week that you've thought about > other ways of implementing exception handling? I guess a > non-reference count based GC is a prerequisite for that... > Yeah, I have tossed the exception handling idea around in my head a little, but the culmination was what I posted. And a non-refcount GC would definitely help, even if the exception handling wasn't changed. More places where you could just return NULL instead of having to deal with DECREFing objects. -Brett
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4