> From: "Martin v. Löwis" [mailto:martin at v.loewis.de] > > My answer is "it depends": If you did not do that, and, for example, > explain why it *can't* be done, than this is a good thesis, > provided you > give qualified scientific rationale for why it can't be done. If you > say you did not do it, but it could be done in this and that way if > you had 50 person years available, then this could be a good thesis > as well, provided the strategy you outline, and the rationale for > computing the 50 person years is convincing. If you just say, "Oops, > I did not finish it because it is too much work", then this would be > a bad thesis. Yep - that was what I was getting at, and your explanation corresponds exactly with my gut feeling. Cheers. Tim Delaney
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4