> >I'm not convinced that we have a problem (beyond Alex lying awake at > >night, that it :-). > > I thought you were proposing to use it for list.sorted, in order to provide > a better error message when used with an instance. If such a descriptor > were implemented, I was suggesting that it would be useful as a form of > documentation (i.e. that a method isn't intended to be called on instances > of the class), and thus it would be nice for it to be exposed for folks > like me who'd take advantage of it. (Especially if PEP 318 is being > implemented.) I mostly just proposed it to placate Alex; I think he's overly worried in this case. PEP 318 seems a ways off. --Guido van Rossum (home page: http://www.python.org/~guido/)
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4