On Thu, Oct 30, 2003 at 03:30:18PM +1300, Greg Ewing wrote: > That's completely different from what I had in mind, which was: > > (1) Keep a reference to the base object in the buffer object, and It already does this. > (2) Use the buffer API to fetch a fresh pointer from the > base object each time it's needed. > > Is there some reason that still wouldn't be safe enough? I don't see any problem with that. It's probably a better solution since it doesn't require a new flag and it lets you create buffers that reference objects like arrays. Neil
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4