"Phillip J. Eby" <pje at telecommunity.com>: > For a protocol p that has immutability as part of its contract, > adapt(x,p) is well within its rights to return an object that is a > "copy" of x in some sense. I don't think that's right -- this should only apply if the original object x is immutable. Otherwise, changes to x should be reflected in the view of it provided by p -- even if p itself provides no operations for mutation. Greg Ewing, Computer Science Dept, +--------------------------------------+ University of Canterbury, | A citizen of NewZealandCorp, a | Christchurch, New Zealand | wholly-owned subsidiary of USA Inc. | greg at cosc.canterbury.ac.nz +--------------------------------------+
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4