Jeremy Hylton wrote: > On Mon, 2003-10-27 at 12:29, Guido van Rossum wrote: > >>>I'm going to make a suggestion. Let's shelve this topic for the time being >>>and simply summarize the issues in an informational PEP aimed at >>>Py3k. >> >>Great idea. I'm getting tired of it too; Alex and I don't seem to be >>getting an inch closer to each other. >> >> >>>We don't even know (at least I don't) if we want an implicit search >>>for outer scope variables or an explicit specification of which >>>scope such variables should be defined in. If, for some reason, >>>nested scopes make a quick exit in Py3k, this would all be moot >>>anyway. >> >>Sorry to disappoint you, but nested scopes aren't going away. > > > I haven't had time to participate in this thread -- too much real work > for the last several days -- but I'd be happy to write a PEP that > summarizes the issues. > Woohoo! PEPs for generator expressions, copying iterators, and now 'global' "stuff"! This will make summarizing the 700-odd emails I have for the next summary (at this point; the thing grows an average of 50 emails a day as of late) a *heck* of a lot easier. Thanks Jeremy, Raymond, and Alex. -Brett
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4