Alex Martelli <aleaxit at yahoo.com>: > Nobody's asking for 3.0*x to work where x is a user-coded type > without an __rmul__; rather, the point is that 3*x should fail too, > and ideally they'd have the same clear error message as 3+x > gives when the type has no __radd__. Okay, that makes sense. Greg Ewing, Computer Science Dept, +--------------------------------------+ University of Canterbury, | A citizen of NewZealandCorp, a | Christchurch, New Zealand | wholly-owned subsidiary of USA Inc. | greg at cosc.canterbury.ac.nz +--------------------------------------+
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4