On Tue, Oct 28, 2003 at 12:19:29AM +0100, Alex Martelli wrote: > The one persistent (but low-as-a-whisper) grumbling is by one > A.M., who keeps mumbling "they're _iterator_ expressions, the fact > that they use generators is an implementation detail, grmbl > grmbl":-). I'm inclined to agree with him. Was there some reason why the term iterator expressions was rejected? Neil
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4