> -----Original Message----- > From: python-dev-bounces+sholden=holdenweb.com at python.org > [mailto:python-dev-bounces+sholden=holdenweb.com at python.org]On > Behalf Of > Zack Weinberg > Sent: Sunday, October 26, 2003 1:15 PM > To: python-dev > Subject: [Python-Dev] Alternate notation for global variable > assignments > > > > I like Just's := concept except for the similarity to =, and I worry > that the presence of := in the language will flip people into "Pascal > mode" -- thinking that = is the equality operator. I also think that > the notation is somewhat unnatural -- "globalness" is a property of > the _variable_, not the operator. So I'd like to suggest instead > > :var = value # var in module scope > :scope:var = value # var in named enclosing scope > > An advantage of this notation is that it can be used anywhere, not > just in an assignment. This has primary value for people reading the > code -- if you have a fairly large class method that uses a module > variable (not by assigning it) somewhere in the middle, writing it > :var means the reader knows to go look for the assignment way up top. > This should obviously be optional, to preserve backward compatibility. > However, its use in such expressions as sublist = lst[:var] would lead to substantial ambiguities, right? regards -- Steve Holden +1 703 278 8281 http://www.holdenweb.com/ Improve the Internet http://vancouver-webpages.com/CacheNow/ Python Web Programming http://pydish.holdenweb.com/pwp/ Interview with GvR August 14, 2003 http://www.onlamp.com/python/
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4