"Martin v. Löwis" <martin at v.loewis.de> wrote in message news:3F9C3FB0.8050206 at v.loewis.de... > Guido van Rossum wrote: > > Luckily I wasn't taught formal writing :-), and I don't see why it > > can't be doesn't. I'd say that if you want Python's error messages to > > be formal writing, you'd have to change a lot more than just the > > one... :-) > > OTOH, I would always yield to native speakers in such issues. To me > myself, it does not matter much, but if native speakers feel happier > one way or the other, I'd like to help them feel happy :-) To add a native-speaker datapoint: I am old enough to remember being taught the same as Greg. (However, American stylistic conventions have tended to get looser since then.) I also remember going through manuscripts to get rid of contractions prior to submission for publication. Given the overloading of apostrophe both in English and Python, I think 'does not' looks slightly better than "doesn't" (which saves only one character and forces a change in quote marks!). So does consistency versus accidental variation ;-) Terry J. Reedy
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4