Guido van Rossum wrote: > The only problem with using :: is a syntactic ambiguity: > > a[x::y] > > already means something (an extended slice with start=x, no stop, and > step=y). On the other hand: a[x y] doesn't mean anything, so I don't see an immediate problem. I like Neal's proposal, including the "::" digraph. Just
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4