Neal Norwitz wrote: > On Mon, Oct 27, 2003 at 07:11:16AM -0800, Guido van Rossum wrote: > >>Hah. Another argument *against* rebinding by :=, and *for* a nonlocal >>declaration. With 'nonlocal n, m' in increment() (or however it's >>spelled :-) the intent is clear. > > > I dislike := very much. I think it will confuse newbies and thus be > abused. While I dislike the global declaration, I don't feel strongly > about changing or removing it. I think ':=' is to close to '='. The default assigment should be much easier to type than the special case. Otherwise I'd have to think about which one I'd like to use every time I type an assigment. Bye, Walter Dörwald
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4