> I'm going to make a suggestion. Let's shelve this topic for the time being > and simply summarize the issues in an informational PEP aimed at > Py3k. Great idea. I'm getting tired of it too; Alex and I don't seem to be getting an inch closer to each other. > We don't even know (at least I don't) if we want an implicit search > for outer scope variables or an explicit specification of which > scope such variables should be defined in. If, for some reason, > nested scopes make a quick exit in Py3k, this would all be moot > anyway. Sorry to disappoint you, but nested scopes aren't going away. --Guido van Rossum (home page: http://www.python.org/~guido/)
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4