On Mon, Oct 27, 2003 at 08:51:16AM -0800, Guido van Rossum wrote: > The only problem with using :: is a syntactic ambiguity: > > a[x::y] > > already means something (an extended slice with start=x, no stop, and > step=y). I'm not wedded to the :: digraph, I prefer the concept. :: was nice because it re-used a similar concept from C++. No other digraph jumps out at me. Some other possibilities (I don't care for any of these): Global Nested ------ ------ :>variable scope:>variable *>variable scope*>variable ->variable scope->variable ?>variable scope?>variable &>variable scope&>variable Or perhaps variations using <. Neal
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4