Skip Montanaro wrote: > Nope. Ok :). Yet I think I'm starting to agree with you and Alex that := should mean "this name is NON-local". A couple more things: - I think augmented assignments CAN be made "rebinding" without breaking code, since currently a += 1 fails if a is neither local nor global. - Would := be allowed in statements like "self.a := 2"? It makes no sense, but since "(a, b) := (2, 3)" IS meaningful, what about "(a, b, self.c) = (1, 2, 3)"? Just
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4