> > How about adding a "rebinding" operator, for example spelled ":=": > > > > a := 2 > > I expect Guido would object to that on the grounds that > it's conferring arbitrary semantics on a symbol. Hardly arbitary (I have fond memories of several languages that used :=). But what is one to make of a function that uses both a := 2 and a = 2 ??? --Guido van Rossum (home page: http://www.python.org/~guido/)
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4