> If we're doing this > (and it seems we are), I still prefer copysort() for clarity. "copysort" sounds like the name of some weird sorting algorithm to me. I'd prefer "sortedcopy" (although I suppose that could be read as a predicate, too -- "is x a sorted copy of y?") Greg Ewing, Computer Science Dept, +--------------------------------------+ University of Canterbury, | A citizen of NewZealandCorp, a | Christchurch, New Zealand | wholly-owned subsidiary of USA Inc. | greg at cosc.canterbury.ac.nz +--------------------------------------+
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4