On Sat, Oct 25, 2003, Alex Martelli wrote: > > So, if I've followed correctly the lots of python-dev mail over the last > few days, that person (Aahz) is roughly +0 on list.sorted as classmethod > and thus we can go ahead. Right? I'm not the person who objected on non-English speaking grounds, and I'm -0 because I don't like using grammatical tense as the differentiator; as I said, I'd expect sorted() to be a predicate. If we're doing this (and it seems we are), I still prefer copysort() for clarity. But I'm not objecting to sorted(). -- Aahz (aahz at pythoncraft.com) <*> http://www.pythoncraft.com/ "It is easier to optimize correct code than to correct optimized code." --Bill Harlan
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4