RetroSearch Browse

Sat Oct 25 12:03:01 EDT 2003 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2003-October/039503.html

In article <200310251618.42221.aleaxit at yahoo.com>,
 Alex Martelli <aleaxit at yahoo.com> wrote:

> On Wednesday 22 October 2003 05:27 am, David Eppstein wrote:
>    ...
> > Currently, I am using expressions like
> >
> > 	pos2d =
> > dict([(s,(positions[s][0]+dx*positions[s][2],positions[s][1]+dy*positions[s
> > ][2]))
> >                for s in positions])
> 
> I _must_ be getting old -- it would never occur to me to write something
> as dense and incomprehensible (and no, removing the "dict([" would not
> make it much clearer).  Something like:
> 
> pos2d = {}
> for s, (x, y, delta) in positions.iteritems():
>     pos2d[s] = x+dx*delta, y+dy*delta
> 
> seems just  SO much clearer and more transparent to me.

I like the comprehension syntax so much that I push it harder than I 
guess I should.  If I'm building a dictionary by performing some 
transformation on the items of another dictionary, I prefer to write it 
in a way that avoids sequencing the items one by one; I don't think of 
that sequencing as an inherent part of the loop.

Put another way, I prefer declarative to imperative when possible.

Let's try to spread it out a little and use intermediate variable names:
    pos2d = dict([(s, (x + dx*z, y + dy*z))
                  for s,(x,y,z) in positions.items()])

Better?

-- 
David Eppstein                      http://www.ics.uci.edu/~eppstein/
Univ. of California, Irvine, School of Information & Computer Science

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2003-October/039503.html below:

[Python-Dev] Re: accumulator display syntax