[Timothy] > It would break any unadorned 'global x' in a nested scope if the > name did not exist anywhere. > > One option would be to have an "if the name doesn't exist, it it > created in module scope". [Greg Ewing] > What would be wrong with that? It's what I had in mind. I believe the <<- operator in the statistical language R <http://www.r-project.org/> behaves exactly like this. While not a compelling reason in itself to adopt this behavior, it's useful to consider constructs in other successful languages.
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4