A RetroSearch Logo

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Search Query:

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2003-October/039385.html below:

[Python-Dev] Re: PEP 289: Generator Expressions (second draft)

[Python-Dev] Re: PEP 289: Generator Expressions (second draft) [Python-Dev] Re: PEP 289: Generator Expressions (second draft)Werner Schiendl ws-news at gmx.at
Thu Oct 23 11:47:24 EDT 2003
Hello,

this is my first post to this list, but I followed it "passive" since quite
some time.

I had a thought about distinguishing the list with 1 iterators vs. list
comprehension issue that did not appear (at least to my eyes) yet.


Why not take the same approach than used for tuples already?

like (5) is just the value 5 and (5,) is a 1-tuple containing the value 5

I thought it would be intuitive to have

[x**2 for x in range(n)]  # be a list comprehension like it currently is
[x**2 for x in range(n),]  # a list with 1 iterator in it

> No, it's a set comprehension where the set elements are pairs.  The dict
> comprehension would be
>
> {x: x**2 for x in range(n)}
>
> Or would that be a single-element dict whose key is x and value is a
> generator expression?  :-)

in this case the same could be applied

{x: x**2 for x in range(n)}  # dict comprehension
{x: x**2 for x in range(n),}  # dict with 1 iterator (but "x" is probably
not a valid name, is it?)


best regards

Werner





More information about the Python-Dev mailing list

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4