A RetroSearch Logo

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Search Query:

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2003-October/039360.html below:

[Python-Dev] Re: Re: buildin vs. shared modules

[Python-Dev] Re: Re: buildin vs. shared modules [Python-Dev] Re: Re: buildin vs. shared modulesMartin v. Löwis martin at v.loewis.de
Thu Oct 23 02:45:19 EDT 2003
"Terry Reedy" <tjreedy at udel.edu> writes:

> So I would hope that a C7.1 build is tested on such before an
> irrevocable commitment is made.

That will happen only if there are volunteers to test it. Those
volunteers would need to be very active while the transition occurs,
i.e. build from CVS instead of just trying out installable packages
(because initially, there would not be any installable packages).

That said, I'm quite confident that a VC7.1-built-MSI-packaged
application could be installed even on Win95 - you would have to
install installer first, though (by means of the four-files packaging
approach).

Regards,
Martin

More information about the Python-Dev mailing list

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4