> Lying awake thinking about this sort of thing last night, > I found myself wondering if there should be a way of > explicitly requesting that a name be evaluated at closure > creation time, e.g. > > pipe = source > for p in predicates: > pipe = e for e in pipe if ^p(e) > > where the ^ means that p is evaluated in the enclosing > scope when the closure is created, and bound to a slot > which behaves like a default-argument slot (but is > separate from the default arguments). Bah. Arbitrary semantics bound to line-noise characters. Guess what that reminds me of. :-) --Guido van Rossum (home page: http://www.python.org/~guido/)
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4